Over 59197
politifake

Attack Politics


Priorities -




CRYBABY IN CHIEF - The opposition is being mean, somebody call Attack Waaaaah-tch!




YOU'RE NEXT SWEDEN - Ya crazy neutral bastards!!!




YOU MIGHT BE AN AMERICAN PATRIOT -




AMERICA - Land of the Free and Home of the Brave. We have to take action to keep it that way in November 2012




THE SMELL OF DESPERATION - It smells like 'Mitt' in here.


TAGS: romney libya attack obama funny
Rating: 2.5/5

More politifakes by romneyisatool

inflatedego - May 10, 2017, 8:21 am
This is epically stupid...
foxrecon19d - September 14, 2012, 9:38 pm
Seeing as how Barack Obama is the President, it was Barack Obama that failed to answer the 3AM phone call. And seeing as how Mitt Romney was the first voice America's counterattack against the Islamists... well, looks like Romney is on the watch


THE WAR ON POVERTY - Does not mean attacking the poor ...




FLIP-FLOP-FLIPPITY-FLOP-FLOP -




ATTACK ADS - Wondering where Newt gets them?




TRUTH IN ADVERTISING - Too bad it does not apply to politicians and their rhetoric.




OBAMA'S NEW ENEMY - Forget about terrorism or illegal immigration. The biggest threat the POTUS sees is the availability of information that points out his lies and deceptions. BTW Mr. President, the U.S. is a Republic, not a Democracy.




PROGRESSIVES - always attack the opposition, hardly ever talk about ideas..... nuff said.




RUMOR: OBAMA IS MY HOMEBOY -




REPUBLICANS - Lets remember the ultimate opponent is Obama, OK?




DEMOCRAT PARTY STILL ATTACKING AND DEMONIZING MONICA -


TAGS: democrat party attacking monica
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by foxrecon19d

EmmaRoydes - June 4, 2014, 3:20 pm
Before you answer that, cranky, please state your position on whether or not the obama rodeo clown was racist.
foxrecon19d - June 4, 2014, 12:42 pm
Is Obama in clown face racist, cranks?
foxrecon19d - June 4, 2014, 12:40 pm
I know cranks didn't make the picture. Much like racist klansmen usually didn't make their own hoods. Funny how if you oppose Obama, you are racist ( Democrat talking point) But opposing any black conservative isn't. Is Obama in clown face racist?
fauxnews - June 3, 2014, 11:02 pm
a) I'm pretty sure Cranky didn't make that picture of West dressed by a clown b) It's common for clowns to be in white make-up, nothing racist about it. c) Clowns have red noses, is that a knock against coke heads? d) You're starting to sound like Vik
crankyhead - June 3, 2014, 8:50 pm
...honest questions for you.
crankyhead - June 3, 2014, 8:49 pm
But you do keep playing the race card fox. I thought I already told you that the clown makeup, at least for me, has nothing to do with the color of the mans skin, and everything to do with his positions on certain issues. No blame shifting, just some...
foxrecon19d - June 3, 2014, 4:29 pm
Takes down picture of black man in white paint as his personal avatar. Begins blaming others of playing the race card. Why are you always playing the race card, cranks? And let crank's typical liberal tactic of shifing blame begin. Watch and learn...
EmmaRoydes - June 2, 2014, 1:50 pm
Nah, it's alzheimers makes me shaky and hit the enter key multiple tiiiiiiiiiiiiimes
OTC - June 2, 2014, 1:21 pm
Are you stuck on that question Emma? lol
crankyhead - June 2, 2014, 10:57 am
Not stuck on the question, just waiting for an answer.
EmmaRoydes - June 2, 2014, 7:55 am
Slow internet today, sorry about the multiple posts
EmmaRoydes - June 2, 2014, 7:54 am
Are you stuck on that questio cranky?
EmmaRoydes - June 2, 2014, 7:54 am
Are you stuck on that questio cranky?
EmmaRoydes - June 2, 2014, 7:54 am
Are you stuck on that questio cranky?
crankyhead - June 2, 2014, 12:36 am
Why you always playing the race card fox?
foxrecon19d - May 30, 2014, 11:09 pm
Boredom, cranks? Is that the liberal term for, "oops, I just got called out for using a picture of a black man in white face?" Don't be "that Canadian", cranks :P
crankyhead - May 30, 2014, 9:50 pm
Changed the picture out of boredom, fox. Repetitive strawman much?
foxrecon19d - May 30, 2014, 9:35 pm
Look who changed his Allen West white face icon in a desperate attempt to hide his typical liberal bigotry and racism. Check mate yourself much, crankyhead?
crankyhead - May 30, 2014, 3:23 pm
Well, we both believe in freedom of speech, for starters.
steve1961 - May 30, 2014, 2:12 pm
That's my point.
crankyhead - May 30, 2014, 6:22 am
Oh I don't think that fox and I are polar opposites. We do have a few things in common.
steve1961 - May 30, 2014, 6:01 am
For people on polar opposite sides of the political spectrum, you two sound so much alike...If I didn't see the your profile names, I don't think I could tell who was who...
crankyhead - May 30, 2014, 1:58 am
Right. That's why I'm still having this conversation with you, because I'm 'running from it'. Sounds legit.
foxrecon19d - May 30, 2014, 1:56 am
Still squirming, crankypants? That this poster perfectly illustrates your beliefs, your motivations, and your tactics, and that you are so pissed off that this poster is so much an illustration of you that you desperately want to run from it, well...
crankyhead - May 30, 2014, 1:51 am
Bottom line fox, this is your poster, and you put a woman in crosshairs on it. Don't blame me for your choices.
foxrecon19d - May 30, 2014, 1:48 am
Ironically, you did, crankypants. As always, all I have to do is keep you talking long enough until you end up "evolving" your position until you think you have blamed someone else for your own beliefs. All folks have to do is read the comment thread
crankyhead - May 30, 2014, 1:41 am
I just proved who the liar is fox, and guess what, it's not me. Facts sure are stubborn, aren't they?
foxrecon19d - May 30, 2014, 1:38 am
Bottom line, crankypants. The fact that this poster perfectly illustrates your beliefs, your motivations, and your tactics, and that you are so pissed off that this poster is so much an illustration of you that you desperately want to run from it, well...
foxrecon19d - May 30, 2014, 1:38 am
Nice try, crankypants. But your own posters prove that you are a liar. Now stop avoinding the question. Why do you target females who can harm the Democrat Party, crankypants? Stop squirming and answer the question.
crankyhead - May 30, 2014, 1:36 am
P.S. This poster has nothing to do with what I believe.
crankyhead - May 30, 2014, 1:35 am
Bottom line: This is your poster, and it has a woman in crosshairs on it.
foxrecon19d - May 30, 2014, 1:32 am
Bottom line, crankypants. The fact that this poster perfectly illustrates your beliefs, your motivations, and your tactics, and that you are so pissed off that this poster is so much an illustration of you that you desperately want to run from it, well...
crankyhead - May 30, 2014, 1:29 am
Again, this is your poster fox. Not mine. You decided to put a woman in crosshairs, not me. Why'd you do that anyway?
foxrecon19d - May 30, 2014, 1:24 am
Again, I am happy to see that when you are faced with your tactics of targeting women, you get so upset that youtry to blame your tactics on the mirror of yourself. Keep squirming, cranks> It's funny to watch
crankyhead - May 30, 2014, 1:23 am
This is your poster fox, not mine. Focus.
crankyhead - May 30, 2014, 1:22 am
Why would you put a woman in crosshairs in the first place fox?
foxrecon19d - May 30, 2014, 1:22 am
It's funny to see you squirming when you are faced with what you have done targeting women, crankypants. Look at all the posts that you have written saying, basically, that you hate seeing what you have done by targeting women.
crankyhead - May 30, 2014, 1:21 am
Squirming? This is your poster, fox. You know, the one with the woman in crosshairs on it?
crankyhead - May 30, 2014, 1:21 am
What does Allen West have to do with this poster, and you putting women in crosshairs fox?
foxrecon19d - May 30, 2014, 1:21 am
It's funny to see you squirming when you are faced with what you have done targeting wome, crankypants. Look at all the posts that you have written saying, basically, that you hate seeing what you have done by targeting women.
foxrecon19d - May 30, 2014, 1:18 am
And while you are at it, crankypants. Tell everyone why you, the self proclaimed representative of liberal tolerance and civil liberty, chooses to represent himself with the typical Democrat racist and bigoted image of a black man in white face
crankyhead - May 30, 2014, 1:15 am
I'm not the guy making poster with women in crosshairs, fox.
foxrecon19d - May 30, 2014, 1:13 am
So, crankypants, your best efforts to desperately change the subject really means you refuse to answer the question of why you support targeting females who can harm the dDemocrat Party.
crankyhead - May 30, 2014, 1:09 am
So fox, when can the rest of us expect you to start making sense again?
foxrecon19d - May 30, 2014, 1:07 am
So, crankypants, now that your desperate attempt to change the subject has again met with epic failure, answer the question. Why do you support targeting females who have the potential of harming your Democrat Party?
foxrecon19d - May 30, 2014, 1:05 am
The reason they don't vote Democrat is the reason why the best Obama could do to find them is hashtag. However, rest a**ured that when Obama let's them die, he will have his 300 votes. Is that why you want them dead, crankypants?
crankyhead - May 30, 2014, 12:59 am
I didn't realize those 300 Nigerian girls voted Democrat. Oh wait, that's right, they didn't.
foxrecon19d - May 30, 2014, 12:57 am
So, crankypants, not that your desperate attempt to change the subject has again met with epic failure, answer the question. Why do you support targeting females who have the potential of harming your Democrat Party?
crankyhead - May 30, 2014, 12:50 am
You really think Ann Coulter is still relevant enough to cause harm to anyone but herself?
foxrecon19d - May 30, 2014, 12:39 am
You need to try harder if you are going to convince anyone that you have the moral high ground in targeting females who have the potential of harming your Democrat Party.
crankyhead - May 29, 2014, 11:59 pm
There's a difference between parodying Ann Coulter's utter lack of empathy for 300 kidnapped children, and you putting crosshairs on Monica Lewinsky. If you believe it's the same thing, that's your issue, not mine.
crankyhead - May 29, 2014, 11:57 pm
A) Is this poster about Dem targeting? B) What's that you said earlier about not staying on topic?
foxrecon19d - May 29, 2014, 9:26 pm
Should I, cranks? You still haven't justified why you feel it is okay to target females who make liberals like you look like hypocritical clowns. Why do you target females who make you look like a hypocritical clown, cranks?
foxrecon19d - May 29, 2014, 9:22 pm
Because it's perfectly fine and acceptable for liberal Democrats like crankyhead to target women. It only becomes a "war" if liberal Democrats get called out
EmmaRoydes - May 29, 2014, 6:53 pm
So why aren't you complaining about dems "targeting"? http://sweetness-light.com/archive/wheres-the-outrage-at-dem-targeting
crankyhead - May 29, 2014, 4:13 pm
You're going have to do better than that fox.
foxrecon19d - May 28, 2014, 3:55 pm
This is my poster crankyhead. it displays YOUR tactics. I'm glad that you admit that the sight of you seeing your own tactics up close and personnal offends you so much that you have to blame your tactics on a politifake poster...
crankyhead - May 15, 2014, 12:08 pm
I'm glad that you feel like you can pretend that this isn't your poster. I'm sure that makes sense to someone other than you, but alas, I don't know who that person is.
foxrecon19d - May 15, 2014, 6:28 am
Thank you for agreeing that you and your kind, by putting women who threaten your Obama into your crosshairs and targeting them is deplorable. I am glad that this poster has shown you the error of your ways, crankyhead.
crankyhead - May 15, 2014, 12:07 am
No JG, I was in my early 20's, and not terribly interested in American politics at the time.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - May 14, 2014, 11:39 pm

I'm a**uming that you're asking him if he was a baby, not a co**suc***. But you're treading a fine line.
JGalt - May 14, 2014, 11:33 pm
were you also crawling around on your knees like she was at that time?
crankyhead - May 14, 2014, 10:36 pm
To answer the question though, I've pointed out how you putting her head in crosshairs somewhat deplorable.
crankyhead - May 14, 2014, 10:34 pm
I wasn't really into politics during the Lewinsky scandal. I do remember thinking that the reaction to it, was a little over the top.
foxrecon19d - May 14, 2014, 9:12 pm
Funny how Obama supporters like you get so bent out of shape when someone illustrates exactly what you do and not what you say. Tell us, cranks, how have you defended the dignity, equality and human rights of Monica Lewinsky? Ready? GO!!!!
crankyhead - May 14, 2014, 6:36 pm
I mean come on, the crosshairs are right there in your poster fox.
crankyhead - May 14, 2014, 6:36 pm
Again, I'm already on the record stating that I'm not on the 'hatred' side of people living with dignity, equality and human rights. You on the other hand...
foxrecon19d - May 14, 2014, 6:18 pm
Keep shovelling, cranks! Go, cranks, go! Go, cranks, go! Hating on Ann Coulter is really helping to erase how you hated all those girls killed by the Taliban!
crankyhead - May 14, 2014, 6:13 pm
Ann Coulter politicised the event. Me, I'm lampooning her empty head. Seriously though, what's your beef with 200 kidnapped little girls? You have any idea how bad it makes you look to be hating them so publicly?
foxrecon19d - May 14, 2014, 6:10 pm
...crankyhead said, as he put his money where his mouth is, laced up his combat boots, grabbed his M4, and proved he wasn't politicizing a tragedy by going to Nigeria. Send postcards, hero!
crankyhead - May 14, 2014, 6:10 pm
I dunno, about as many posters as you made supporting Al Queda kidnapping little girls because you hate them, I guess. =)
crankyhead - May 14, 2014, 6:06 pm
Oh I'm not Mother Teresa, but on the other end of that spectrum, I'm not Ann Coulter either. =) P.S. Why do you hate those 200 kidnapped girls so much?
foxrecon19d - May 14, 2014, 6:04 pm
Hey, cranks! How many posters did you make supporting George Bush's fight against the Taliban? Hypocrite much? Keep shovelling, Mother Theresa
foxrecon19d - May 14, 2014, 6:02 pm
Keep shovelling, Mother Theresa....
crankyhead - May 14, 2014, 5:59 pm
It is in support of the kidnapped Nigerian girls fox. I never oppose the struggle for equality and human rights, here in Canada or anywhere else in the world. That's why I identify as a Liberal, and not a Conservative.
foxrecon19d - May 14, 2014, 5:39 pm
HA! HA! Uh oh. Lying now, cranks? I thought it was a poster in support of 200 kidnapped Nigerian girls, your penance for opposing the fight against the Taliban as they adused girls in Afghanistan
crankyhead - May 14, 2014, 5:32 pm
Except that my Ann Coulter poster isn't an attack, it's a lampoon. And that's the difference between you and me fox, a sense of humor.
crankyhead - May 14, 2014, 5:31 pm
And for the record, Ann Coulter doesn't threaten the left, if anything, she only encourages intelligent women to stop supporting the right.
foxrecon19d - May 14, 2014, 5:30 pm
Cranks, take a step back. Take a deep breath. Realize that you just check mated yourself by making a poster attacking a female while at the same time being offended at a poster showing Democrats like you attacking females.
crankyhead - May 14, 2014, 5:29 pm
I didn't put crosshairs on a woman fox, you did.
foxrecon19d - May 14, 2014, 5:23 pm
***snicker*** awwww... you know cracks, me watching you get called out for putting cross hairs on women who threaten the Democrat Party (Ann Coulter) then getting your panties in a bind because you got called out for it is hilarious. U mad, bro?
crankyhead - May 14, 2014, 5:14 pm
Do you deny making this poster fox? Do you deny that there are crosshairs on this poster fox? Do you deny that there is a woman in those crosshairs fox? Chin up buddy. =)
crankyhead - May 14, 2014, 5:13 pm
Just keep repeating the lie, huh fox? Too bad you're pretty much only talking to yourself.
foxrecon19d - May 14, 2014, 5:09 pm
Ahhhhh...so Republicans are attacking Monica Lewinsky, Ann Coulter, Sarah Palin, etc. Nice try, cranks. And thanks for taking the lead in justifying the Democrat War Against Women.
crankyhead - May 14, 2014, 5:02 pm
I was referring to good ol Republican you, fox. =)
foxrecon19d - May 14, 2014, 5:00 pm
Oh, putting women like Sarah Palin, Ann Romney, Ann Coulter, Condie Rice, Monica Lewinsky etc in the Democrat Party cross hairs screams Democrat War on Women. Glad you agree, cranks!
crankyhead - May 14, 2014, 4:43 pm
Does anything scream "War on Women" louder than putting a woman in cross-hairs? Uh oh, fox, you've really stepped in it this time.


LET THE ATTACK BEGIN - Now




DNC DEBBIE - Aren't those fangs a little too sharp lady?




IF ONLY.... - He attacked the debt as much as he's attacked Bush and Romney!




Good Luck -




NOW YOU KKNOW WHAT BARACK OBAMA AND THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD WERE DISCUSSING TOGETHER -




AMAZING... EITHER DEMOCRAT POLITICIANS ARE SO DRUNK WITH POWER THEY DON'T CARE IF THEY SOUND LIKE HYPOCRITES, OR IF DEMOCRAT VOTERS ARE JUST TOO DUMB TO NOTICE -


TAGS: democrats attack irs victims
Rating: 4.8/5

More politifakes by foxrecon19d

JGalt - June 6, 2013, 6:24 am
http://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/562862/changing-the-subject-2.pdf
JGalt - June 6, 2013, 6:24 am
OWS was planned months in advance, the money trail points to Soros and company, paying for people to sit and then stay in h**els at night...


NEVADA RANCHER ATTACKED BY FEDS- REMEMBER WHEN... -


TAGS: nevada rancher attacked by feds
Rating: 4.71/5

More politifakes by foxrecon19d

EmmaRoydes - April 21, 2014, 10:55 pm
Probably too late for that. This is the internet, it makes my heart bleed :)
foxrecon19d - April 21, 2014, 7:26 pm
Try not to let the feds know that you have acquired that knowledge. It is not allowed by the government.
EmmaRoydes - April 21, 2014, 7:13 pm
It appears that the BLM has its eyes on 90,000 acres of land in Texas (land that is already deeded to ranchers)


OBVIOUSLY A NEST OF RIGHT WING EXTREMISTS -




NEW IRS DATA - shows millionaires are paying higher tax rates than middle-class families.




Don Imus was fired for his comments -


TAGS: double standards for liberal hate comments attacking right wing
Rating: 4.56/5

More politifakes by OTC

StoneTools - November 21, 2013, 7:49 am
Bashir claims it was his decision alone, yet there was a graphic and his remarks on the teleprompter. Sounds like it involved more of the slimeballs at MSLSD than just him.
StoneTools - November 21, 2013, 1:37 am
Would bashir have been fired if he said someone should crap on obama or urinate in his mouth instead of saying it should happen to palin? It's just part of the left's War on Women!


WHO ATTACKED 47% OF AMERICANS -




ATTACKED -




IMMUTABLE TRUTH -




Muslims Foil Terrorist Attack -


TAGS: muslims foil terrorist attack
Rating: 3.89/5

More politifakes by PapaFox

PapaFox - April 23, 2013, 5:23 pm
Hardly a unique event. Read more news from Muslim countries, and how they oppose extremism.
JGalt - April 23, 2013, 4:23 pm
Europe would welcome similar support, having many more bombings than here in the U.S.
JGalt - April 23, 2013, 4:23 pm
It has been a long while coming dude!


C.O.T.U.S. - Crybaby of the United States




LEAVE LAW-ABIDING AMERICAN BUSINESSES ALONE! - (Anti-corporate/anti-Christian blogs+MSM advocacy journalism)x SEIU= job sabotaging smear machine.




ROMNEY FAILS LEADERSHIP TEST WITH LIBYA - I guess Michelle Obama was right: "Politics doesn't change who you are, it reveals who you are."


TAGS: libya attack embassy romney funny
Rating: 2.54/5

More politifakes by romneyisatool

JGalt - September 12, 2012, 10:45 pm
Not to mention B&O's lack of job creation experience (US jobs that is)
foxrecon19d - September 12, 2012, 8:39 pm
Obama and Biden's 20 years of foreign policy experience led to the rise of Sharia Law, the rise of the Muslim Brotherhood, a united Iran and North Korea building nuclear capable ICBMs, and impending war with Iran, Libya and Egypt. See you at the MEPS.


ROMNEY ON LIBYA: THE REVIEWS ARE IN! - What a pile of 'Mitt.'


TAGS: romney libya funny attack embassy
Rating: 2.54/5

More politifakes by romneyisatool

GrouchoMarxist - September 13, 2012, 1:22 am
Yawnnnnnn


RMONEY: FOREIGN POLICY WIMP - Attacks the President when the nation mourns deaths of slain Americans. (What a 'Mitt' head!)


TAGS: romney libya embassy attack funny
Rating: 2.26/5

More politifakes by romneyisatool

GrouchoMarxist - September 13, 2012, 8:12 pm
Empty stool apologises ....


FOREIGN POLICY: COWARDLY ROMNEY STINKS LIKE MITT - Obama is cool on the outside, but burns for America on the inside. Romney is cool on the inside, and burns his chances with America!


TAGS: romney obama libya attack funny
Rating: 2.25/5

More politifakes by romneyisatool

GrouchoMarxist - September 13, 2012, 8:11 pm
Empty stool swings again and hits nothing
OlderThanDirt - September 13, 2012, 6:37 pm
Great post, thatmfguy! Thank you.
thatmfguy - September 13, 2012, 2:00 pm
How horrible, guess it's only OK when Obama does it, right? http://www.buzzfeed.com/andrewkaczynski/barack-obama-used-troop-deaths-to-ding-bush-mccai


ISLAMIC TERROR IN EUROPE - Islamic terrorism is perceived as being the biggest threat worldwide yet the EU only faced one Islamist terrorist attack in 2008. Separatist terrorism, not Islamic affects the EU most.


TAGS: attacks terror death religion fear
Rating: 1.44/5

More politifakes by SethMythrax

foxrecon19d - September 16, 2012, 3:06 pm
In 2008, I visited my sister in Germany. In Hnnover, 50,000 Islamists protested in the streets while British musicians performed concerts proclaiming that "SHARIA LAW IS THE ONLY WAY FOR PEACE!"
foxrecon19d - September 16, 2012, 3:01 pm
Unfortunately, this graph is true...but there is a reason why. The EU, Germany, Spain and Great Britain, are trading security for adopting Islamic Sharia Law. Classis Chicago policitcs on a grand scale..
GrouchoMarxist - September 16, 2012, 11:14 am
Source


Truth- Democrats attack Democrats at Democrat event- Democrats blame Trump, then Democrats bury story -




Fascist Democrats be like -




Islam is the religion of peace and tolerance -




Welcome! With open arms and eyes wide shut! -


TAGS: parliament attacked by unvetted terrorist
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by ScatXXVII

Aurielius - March 23, 2017, 10:12 am
Unfortunately the Terrorist was UK born...he was however on the MI-5 watch-list. It's always tempting to be current but concrete facts usually take at least 24 hours.


Reza Aslan #LondonAttacks -




Democrat Fake News Brainwashing -




Traitor-In-Chief Obama -


TAGS: traitor in chief obama iran nuclear deal ayatollahs nuke attacks on america treason intercontinental ballistic missiles icbms
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

freasy - July 17, 2015, 10:16 am
Inspections, why yes the IAEC can inspect given 25 days notice... What total BS
Bandit5906 - July 16, 2015, 10:38 pm
Disarming Iran? We give them 100 Billion dollars, allow them unfettered access to weapons of war, renewed nuclear program and America should be happy?
mittromney - July 16, 2015, 8:33 pm
/bombing Iraq did nothing to stabilize the Middle East, bankrupted America and empowered ISIS. Obama's diplomacy is far from perfect but that was a neat trick in disarming Iran. Republitards everywhere should be jealous/


More Democrat Delusion -


TAGS: vetting process fail islamic attack
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by WaambulanceDriver

Cyberhagen - December 10, 2016, 1:15 pm
I mean, he was, but not a recent immigrant. He moved here when he was just 2 years old, and got naturalized in 2008. So, he's not really a standard case. He seems to have gotten radicalized through the Internet.
Cyberhagen - December 10, 2016, 12:49 pm
He wasn't an immigrant.


Liberal attack dog -


TAGS: attack dog
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by JohnGalt

ElevenBlavo - September 8, 2016, 6:22 pm
Like how the mothers of our Americans who were killed in Benghazi were treated when they dared to defy the Democrat Party narrative by saying they did not believe their sons were killed over a youtube video, but because they were abandoned by Clinton
ElevenBlavo - September 8, 2016, 6:18 pm
Must not disrupt the Democrat Party narrative with something as petty as the opposition actually believes, right?


powder puff questions -




Operation Fast & Furious -




The TRUTH about Dr. Wei-Hock Soon -




still waiting for a list of qualifications -




Unfathomable German Dhimmitude -




The Left & The Cult Of Moral Relativism -


TAGS: moral relativism liberalism islam jihad multiculturalism dumbing down of america liberal hypocrisy progressives democrats leftists moonbats san bernardino terrorist attack confederate flag isis radical muslims
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

fauxnews - February 7, 2016, 1:37 pm
*yawn* See #79028 X-D
calron - February 7, 2016, 1:36 pm
So repeat the same thing over and over while while ironically complaining about me going in circles. Nice to see your double standard there.
fauxnews - February 7, 2016, 4:59 am
See comment(s)#79016,#79027.
calron - February 7, 2016, 12:47 am
Why, because you say so? I see more a**umption on your part about used to attack me and no support for your own a**ertions and of course failed to address the different reactions by changing to "Christians". Libs cried about banning one and not the other.
fauxnews - February 6, 2016, 10:55 pm
Nice strawman you got going there:-) See?That's the proper use of that accusation.The best part is the phony conviction.*applause*Not Golden Globe worthy but almost convincing. When you actually wanna respond to what I actually said, I will be around. :-)
calron - February 6, 2016, 9:14 pm
Hey look you switching the subject to cover. And of course you previous reply to me is is series of personal attacks and no actual argument. Personally I believe that BOTH are protected and thus neither should be banned. But thanks for the a**umptions.
Cyberhagen - February 6, 2016, 4:52 pm
Actually, I don't care about the confederate flag. I"m a northerner, no kneejerk reaction here. I'm just saying they need to keep the playing field level. Christianity's most violent days are in the past, but Islam just keeps getting a lot worse.
fauxnews - February 6, 2016, 3:05 pm
[email protected]
fauxnews - February 6, 2016, 3:05 pm
P.S.Your a***ogy over the knee-jerk reaction to ban the Confed.flag would only work in this case if the same people tried to ban Xtian fundamentalist expression as well,which go-hand-and-hand with the Confed.flag.They didn't.Sorry,you're wrong. Later mate
fauxnews - February 6, 2016, 3:00 pm
If you think Democracy had a kneejerk reaction over the Confed.flag,but not over Islam then perhaps u havent been paying attention to Trump's huge popularity in the states.Closemindedness over Islam is WELL represented by the USA too,worry not.Cheers(2/2)
fauxnews - February 6, 2016, 2:55 pm
lolololol...At least as many, if not more, were slain under the banner of Christianity. If you're cool with banning all Christian images in the states as well, then at least you're consistent. Though I have a feeling you're uncool with that. (1/2)
Cyberhagen - February 6, 2016, 1:38 pm
You don't see the point made here? One was punished, the other is not. Now I await your next nasty ad hominem attack. Wait, no, actually, I don't, I don't care.
fauxnews - February 6, 2016, 10:10 am
You made no point, so there was nothing to dodge or cover. You're just being an enabler of Tea Party nonsense. Your narcissistic logic is proof of nothing here. Move along? lololol..Sorry,gonna stick around. :-( You can move along though :-D Cheers, Chris
calron - February 6, 2016, 3:02 am
So dodge the point and launch more personal attacks to cover. Nothing new here, move along.
fauxnews - February 5, 2016, 2:42 am
Hopefully, that clears it up for you 'soldier'.lol Have a good night, Chris :-)
fauxnews - February 5, 2016, 2:10 am
Strawmen are "bases"?For what,exactly?Crows? X-D Speaking of"new material", your strawman shtick is SO 2015. Time to find a new one-trick pony/word.P.S.Lib in his delusions was suggesting the left, and I,were somehow guilty of a double standard.Nuff'said
calron - February 5, 2016, 1:51 am
I don't see anyone, other than you of course, suggesting that anyone has suggested that both of these people are not terroristic. But is nice to see the strawman as bases for yet another personal attack.
fauxnews - February 5, 2016, 12:15 am
They are BOTH terrorists. No one on the left (or the right for the matter) is suggesting otherwise. This is proof of nothing, other than your delusions. The only thing odder than that is the coughing gag you're over-playing.lol Get new material. G'nite
Libertas - February 4, 2016, 10:25 pm
waiting for fauxnews to comment on this one about two wrongs not making a right, cough cough... LOL


Obama's ISIS Strategy: Just Ignore Them & They'll Go Away -




Obama Has a Way With Words -




Media Mendacity -




Barack Too Busy Watching ESPN To Pay Attention To Current Events -


TAGS: obama espn idiot in chief islamic terrorism isis isil liberals democrats progressives foreign policy san bernardino attack
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

calron - December 20, 2015, 2:54 pm
I thought he refused to even read briefings he didn't like.
Libertas - December 20, 2015, 7:01 am
but I thought he told us he went to his intel briefings during his recent adress to the nation to finally gell us that it was no longer workplace violence but terrorism.


Liberal Logic -




Gun Control Fact -




Idiot-In-Chief -




It's Started -




night of the voting dead -




Hillary's Reaction To Paris Terror Attacks -




This Leader Is Way Behind -




Obama's Disdain for the Military -




USS Forrestal -




Palestinians celebrate attack on Jerusalem synagogue -




Martyr For Free Speech -




under surveillance -




media lap dogs for democrats -


TAGS: hillary worshipped sarah attacked media bias more journalistic failure
Rating: 4.38/5

More politifakes by OTC

fauxnews - May 25, 2015, 10:59 pm
Words of wisdom, mate - Self-deprecating humor might work as a dodge if it wasn't already true that only person you ever make fun of with this stuff is yourself. ;-) Food for thought...
calron - May 25, 2015, 10:52 pm
What does my tin foil hat have to do with anything?
fauxnews - May 25, 2015, 10:50 pm
Translation (Calvon): The tinfoil thing is still getting to me :-/
calron - May 25, 2015, 10:47 pm
You have to try to mind read better than that.
fauxnews - May 25, 2015, 10:38 pm
Translation (Calvon): Ignoring him out loud by pretending I don't get the joke isn't working. Gotta keep trying, sweating now. And now, the tinfoil thing is pushing my b'uttons. :-/
calron - May 25, 2015, 10:35 pm
Come one faux, your spelling isn't that bad. Though your mind reading can use much more work.
fauxnews - May 25, 2015, 10:28 pm
Translation (Calvon): Time to triple down. Why isn't this working? How can he tell that he is pushing my b***ons? Is the bad spelling a nervous tic? I know he can't see me on my mom's computer. Need more tinfoil.
calron - May 25, 2015, 10:23 pm
Dang faux, your really on a roll with these admission tonight. :)
fauxnews - May 25, 2015, 10:20 pm
Translation (Calvon): Maybe if I double down and pretend 'again' that it doesn't bother me, he will buy it.
calron - May 25, 2015, 10:16 pm
Dang faux, I'd thought you'd never admit to that it ether. ;P
fauxnews - May 25, 2015, 9:31 pm
TRANSLATION (Calvon): I'll play stupid and pretend that I don't get it when he is sarcastically translating 'other' people's lame comebacks. Maybe he will be too distracted to know my notice my OWN lame comeback. =p
calron - May 25, 2015, 9:09 pm
Dang faux, I'd thought you'd never admit to it. :P
fauxnews - May 19, 2015, 8:17 pm
TRANSLATION (IMMAassEnnIBeeEss) http://i.imgur.com/Vw4sDg6.jpg
rebeccaolsen - May 19, 2015, 6:52 pm
So says the fail troll. At least you have enough sense not to call us "attack dogs" this time around. :) Your slip is showing, hun.
MMessEnnBeeCee - May 19, 2015, 5:13 pm
Are you always this obstinate or do you have problems controlling your ego?
fauxnews - May 19, 2015, 4:35 pm
TRANSLATION (OTC): I'm a Fox News fan denier. If it's reality, gotta deny it.
fauxnews - May 19, 2015, 4:34 pm
Fox News is not right leaning...lolololol..It's a far-right propaganda network. #REALITYFAIL
OTC - May 19, 2015, 3:44 pm
And that still doesn't say what you claim I said
OTC - May 19, 2015, 3:43 pm
I would think reasonable people would see an observation of one right leaning network compared to all the networks on the left. one opposing view compared to 5, & Fox isn't that far to the right. Showing how scared liberals are doesn't mean I'm a big fan
fauxnews - May 19, 2015, 2:18 am
OTC, you made a poster that says, "ATTACK FOX NEWS - Because the last thing a Socialist America needs, is an opposing view." Most reasonable people will infer you are a big fan, especially considering it's a political network. Cheers
fauxnews - May 19, 2015, 2:15 am
??? OP on #75252 April 17, 2015 You Responded - May 19th Nice necropsying. Even so - www.politifake.org/attack-fox-news-dumbcrats-liberals-politics-5042.html wrote "ATTACK FOX NEWS - Because the last thing a Socialist America needs, is an opposing view."
OTC - May 19, 2015, 12:35 am
Nope, after studying these two posters I still don't see where I made the claim thaat Fox News is the most trusted network with more viewers. I supposed that my recent posters about MSNBC will make you think I've switched loyalty? lol
rebeccaolsen - April 19, 2015, 3:03 pm
http://wealthydebates.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/shop.jpg
rebeccaolsen - April 19, 2015, 3:03 pm
scientific method. You DENY it, the outcome of it (the consensus - as the scientific debate over MMCC is now over), and its findings. Hence, you are a DENIER. Simple. Glad "you liked" science class in school. Do them a favor. Stick with shop class hun. :)
rebeccaolsen - April 19, 2015, 2:58 pm
"The other science?" LOL There is no OTHER science hun. :) There is SCIENCE, one branch of it is KNOWN AS climatology. They investigated man-made climate change which ended in a consensus BY them, by science, that MMCC is unequivocal. There is only one
rebeccaolsen - April 19, 2015, 2:52 pm
If you deny God then you may DENY the BELIEFS of religion. My point was,when it comes TO religion - I don't think faux (or those cut of his cloth) CARE if you call him a "denier." WE accept the consequences, the reality. You don't. That's YOUR bag, OTC.
calron - April 19, 2015, 2:16 pm
So have you looked at the links I provided where a lot of scientists also say we are contributing, but not the main cause? The consensus studies themselves often use a low enough standard that you are agreeing with them.
OTC - April 19, 2015, 9:22 am
I actually enjoyed science classes in school, and being mechanically inclined, basically everything I worked on or repaired involved science, so there you go.
OTC - April 19, 2015, 9:18 am
In the other argument, if you deny God, then you must deny religion. But how can you deny religion when thhere are churches and TV evangelist begging for your money?
OTC - April 19, 2015, 9:07 am
As I said before,my belief is we are contributing, not causing CC. You are the ones denying the other science that pertains to CC. Climate is not static, it changes, history proves that
OTC - April 19, 2015, 9:02 am
the planned Biodiversity Strategy, which may be a good thing for the planet, but power and greed corrupt, and the gov't can abuse that like everything else they get control of. So this push that humans are a problem concerning climate, I get skeptical
OTC - April 19, 2015, 8:59 am
Sorry, I don't trust the government when they can lie and do what they want. They lied about the income tax (it was supposed to be voluntary and never over 7%) EPA lied, John C Beale another gov't liar, and it just seems strange that GW started ahead of
OTC - April 19, 2015, 8:46 am
40 out of 100,000 molecules in the air are CO2 and even smaller number of that 40 are MMCO2, and that tiny bit is causing CC? I deny that humans are the major factor in the changing of climate, I don't deny science. Why is that so hard to understand?
rebeccaolsen - April 19, 2015, 3:04 am
:p
rebeccaolsen - April 19, 2015, 2:43 am
You actually do deny science OTC. Taking a wild stab at this - but I imagine faux recognizes that the scientific community doesn't think your denial makes you a bad person, nor should they. They don't have to. They just don't give a **** what you think :)
fauxnews - April 19, 2015, 2:43 am
You know, becca, I've sh** people for less X-D (it's the withdrawal talking, I promise).
rebeccaolsen - April 19, 2015, 2:31 am
Boy this is dumb OTC, even for you - a rational person can deny the literalness and superstition some zealots invest in religion while acknowledging the existence of religious ideology, and even respecting it to some degree.
rebeccaolsen - April 19, 2015, 2:20 am
Who need cigarettes, faux, when you can bite into an healthy organic carrot or pop into your trap a stick of refreshing gum? Instead of smoke breaks, a nice fresh air break. Yes - I'm being ornery and annoying on purpose. :)
OTC - April 19, 2015, 2:15 am
BTW faux, you deny God exists, does that mean you deny religion exists as well?
calron - April 19, 2015, 2:04 am
Here'e a handy link as if goes to the studies in question where you can read the them in total, http://www.populartechnology.net/2014/12/all-97-consensus-studies-refuted-by.html
calron - April 19, 2015, 2:03 am
Cook had a nice breakdown with the study. However double checking by other did not come up with the same results. Some of the others have been accused of padding, but Zimmerman was a poll.
OTC - April 19, 2015, 1:51 am
Still, someone had to come up with that number and no one can tell me who or how. Did they just use papers that leaned toward MMCC, or did they use all the research papers?
OTC - April 19, 2015, 1:45 am
Depends on how you ask too, as in the Zimmerman survey. Many scientists had a problem answering the question and supposedly some refused to answer because of how it was written
calron - April 19, 2015, 1:43 am
And OTC might be arguing the more than 1/2 and dangerous standard, which would be even lower. That's why defining exactly what is meant in an argument is important.
OTC - April 19, 2015, 1:42 am
and the climate seems to be getting cooler (at least here in the south where the last 2 Springs have been unseasonally cool)
calron - April 19, 2015, 1:39 am
The consensus among climatologists is actually around 90% if you ask if a significant amount of warming is AGW. If you ask if more than 1/2 is then that number drops even lower.
OTC - April 19, 2015, 1:39 am
Again, I don't deny science, or that we shouldn't be good stewards of earth and pollute, and I don't deny we are contributing to CO2, but when people are profiting from MMCC fear, then I have to question it, especially when the ice caps didn't melt
OTC - April 19, 2015, 1:31 am
when their has been a huge 'green' movement against pollution,oil, and energy using current global heating as a tool to further an agenda? Just as in the Bee-Gate, where scientists drew a conclusion before the research simply to ban a pesticide
OTC - April 19, 2015, 1:26 am
I'm mention 97% because that's what it's know as,it could be 80 to 100% for that matter as that's still a majority, but therre are reports of the consensus being doctored, so how do we know papers not favoring MMCC were omitted to make a bigger percentage
fauxnews - April 19, 2015, 1:26 am
Have a good one, OTC. Cheers =)
fauxnews - April 19, 2015, 1:25 am
Accept my apology if I over did it. Truly, it was nothing personal. I just got carried away is all. Still loves ya, mate. ;-) We are just doing our Siskel and Ebert thing. I enjoy it too. Just take me with a grain of salt. You enjoy the weekend as well
fauxnews - April 19, 2015, 1:23 am
haha...You didn't push my b.uttons mate ;-) Im always this cantankerous when I quit smoking.Sorry if I came off as harsh.I admit I was being too opinionated.I truly didn't mean it.Just got caught up in the spirit of things and was being overly competitive
fauxnews - April 19, 2015, 1:20 am
correction(#75389): "No one in their right mind would suggest that MOST (if not NEARLY ALL) climatologists do 'NOT' find MMCC to be unequivocal."
OTC - April 19, 2015, 1:19 am
I usually enjoy sparring with you, but you went off the deep end, sorry, didn't mean to push your bu.tton, have a good weekend mate
fauxnews - April 19, 2015, 1:18 am
They are only guilty of being a little rough around the edges and over simplifying things a bit for an ignorant public. But whether THE TRUTH is the consensus is 95.2% or 99.3%, they are still in the right ballpark. You're splitting hairs, mate.(2/2)
fauxnews - April 19, 2015, 1:16 am
In other words, OTC, you can't see the forest for the trees. No one in their right mind would suggest that MOST (if not NEARLY ALL) climatologists find MMCC to be unequivocal. Four peer-reviewed meta studies on the consensus uphold this (1/2)
OTC - April 19, 2015, 1:14 am
It's not my own science, its science other than MMCC, such as cosmoclimatology, pacific decadal oscillation, earth's orbit etc. but because those don't fit the MMCC narrative its just junk political science
fauxnews - April 19, 2015, 1:13 am
(on OTC#75383) You are misrepresenting facts completely.Virtually every peer-reviewed study and reputable climatologist finds that MMCC is unequivocal when they examine the findings.They invite your skepticism.But reject your baseless denial.
OTC - April 19, 2015, 1:11 am
Denying we are a major factor in the game is not the same as denying science. you believe we are, I believe its nature and that this would be happening (as it has done in the history of earth) even if we weren't burning fossil fuels.
fauxnews - April 19, 2015, 1:06 am
...but, aside from junk science (which is NOT really science) you can't have your OWN 'science' (not in the objective logical sense, at least - as in, you can have your OWN set of opinions, but not your OWN set of facts). Cheers
fauxnews - April 19, 2015, 1:04 am
According to the Christian theology, I probably AM blasphemous and I'm probably going to their hell in their worldview. I can live with their opinion of me. Why? Because I can care less what they think of me. You can have your own religion...
OTC - April 19, 2015, 1:04 am
And l report that said as little as 79 papers were used to draw a consensus. Kinda like "4 out of 5 dentists agree.." Where dies that come from? Someone has to make that determination, can they be trusted? Who decided on the 97%, Cook, Zimmerman, Doran?
fauxnews - April 19, 2015, 1:02 am
Well science says MMCC is unequivocal and you are denying it. I'm just telling you what the science SAYS. No one is saying you have to AGREE with the science; you have the freedom to DENY it all you want. I deny God exists.Feel free to call me blasphemous
OTC - April 19, 2015, 12:56 am
Consensus was determined, it makes me wonder if some papers were disregarded for not favoring MMCC which would give a different outcome as I've read there were only 200 papers out of 1000's that were used to derive the 97%
OTC - April 19, 2015, 12:51 am
I love how I'm labeled a 'science denier' because I don't believe MMCO2. is causing global warming but contributing to it along with other factors that may have a greater percentage of an effect than what we are doing. since I couldn't find how the
fauxnews - April 19, 2015, 12:02 am
But yeah, I whole-heartedly agree that both sides engage in a denialism that is equally stupid. We are all guilty of letting our politics get in the way. It's the people that can't admit it that are THE REAL troublemakers. My 2 cents,Calron.Cheers,mate =)
fauxnews - April 19, 2015, 12:00 am
...I dont think there is a problem even as severe as MMCC that we humans cant evolve past.But that require BOTH SIDES to let go of their dogma.They need to acknowledge science(ie.deniers)and how their personal politics ONLY makes things worse(ie.the left)
fauxnews - April 18, 2015, 11:59 pm
...I dont think there is a problem even as severe as MMCC that we humans cant evolve past.But that require BOTH SIDES to let go of their dogma.They need to acknowledge science(ie.deniers)and how their personal politics ONLY makes things worse(ie.the left)
fauxnews - April 18, 2015, 11:57 pm
...the documentary "Pandora's Promise" shows how the left is complicit as the right in keeping us dependent on a status quo that is killing our planet by basically starving our species of "progress." I think the left underestimates human ingenuity...
fauxnews - April 18, 2015, 11:56 pm
...the problem over MMCC will probably largely fix itself when we run out of oil, which will happen sooner than we like to think. But between the damage we've already done to the planet AND our addiction to oil, that is WHERE calamity awaits us...
fauxnews - April 18, 2015, 11:54 pm
...The left are NUCLEAR POWER deniers in that they fail to acknowledge that nuclear power probably holds the ONLY PROMISE to accommodating society in the face of peak oil and a calamity on the horizon caused by oil dependence...
fauxnews - April 18, 2015, 11:53 pm
...the film indicts THE RIGHT for denying science and being in the pocket of oil companies. It also indicts the left for DENYING the realities of our energy needs by attacking nuclear power which is safer than stereotypes suggest...
fauxnews - April 18, 2015, 11:52 pm
...Green energies won't fix a planet THIS overpopulated and dependent on oil. We need to convert to nuclear power...and FAST. There is a great documentary I always squawk about titled "Pandora's Promise". It indicts both the right and the left...
fauxnews - April 18, 2015, 11:50 pm
...For me, climate change is a window (a symptom) into a MUCH LARGER problem, energy co-dependence. That is what is really sinking our species. It makes everyone dependent on the volatile Middle East for our survival...
fauxnews - April 18, 2015, 11:49 pm
...To evoke a figurative a***ogy, Calron, climatology is right in their diagnosis of the disease.But the FAR-RIGHT inadvertently makes a powerful case that the liberals have come up with a cure that only makes it worse....
fauxnews - April 18, 2015, 11:46 pm
(reply to #75361) Yes, I agree on this. I think the left would LOVE to use the consensus on MMCC to create an eco elite where lame green energy alternatives and wacky anti-vaxxer wholistic beliefs are empowered.To me it's in the same league as scientology
fauxnews - April 18, 2015, 11:44 pm
(reply to #75366)Aye, mate. Like I said, it's hard to have a proper dialogue on a commentboard with this limits. Easy to get lazy or be sloppy. ;-) Usually I mean "climatologists" on this debate when I say scientists. Good catch.
fauxnews - April 18, 2015, 11:42 pm
...Even if climatology is finding that MMCC is real, I don't think that represents an indictment. The politicians are doing that, and hopefully people go after the hard targets (the people in power) not the easy targets; which are just strawmen.Cheers:-)
calron - April 18, 2015, 11:40 pm
Looks like you didn't see my last post as well as the link. You really should say climatologists when you point to very high levels of agreement. If you are less specific then you get about 20% in decent.
fauxnews - April 18, 2015, 11:39 pm
...So, even though that is true, when deniers go after the scientists to get back at the liberals and the media, that is simply wrong..and a strategy destined to backfire. It's scapegoating...
fauxnews - April 18, 2015, 11:38 pm
In other words, it is NOT the scientists that should be blamed for doing their jobs. But the media, and politicians, who likes to make everything into a soap opera....
fauxnews - April 18, 2015, 11:37 pm
...(cont.from #75362)as all the scientists are saying is that MMCC is unequivocal AND it is serious. But then the libs jump in and conflate it to scare people...which I agree is wrong...
fauxnews - April 18, 2015, 11:35 pm
...In other words, the science community saying MMCC is unequivocal hopefully isn't the same thing as saying WE ARE DOOMED! I know the scientists are saying this. That's where the media IS at fault (as well as some libs)
calron - April 18, 2015, 11:35 pm
Unfortunately a lot of misinformation gets put out by both sides, but something I found interesting is... https://news.uns.purdue.edu/images/2014/prokopy-climatetable.pdf It shows consensus on one point and yet disagreement on another.
fauxnews - April 18, 2015, 11:33 pm
I think it's fair to say that science is saying MMCC is unequivocal. However, I think it's idiotic to a**UME that this is a doom and gloom scenario. To say this means it is the end of the world is as bad as denying the science IMHO
fauxnews - April 18, 2015, 11:32 pm
we could probably have a dialogue that would allow for the nuance and thoughtfulness to come through. You'd see we are more alike in our skepticism that you'd think. I'm being reductive here for the purpose of practicality.
fauxnews - April 18, 2015, 11:31 pm
(replying to #75354 and #75355) Believe it or not, Calron, we agree more than it appears. I don't really disagree with your position per say *sigh* It's hard to have an effective debate on a commentboard :-/ In a more thoughtful setting,like our own forum
fauxnews - April 18, 2015, 11:29 pm
But that shouldnt stop scientists across the board from challenging this.Hopefully they will keep at it.I would love it if IT did turn out they were wrong.Who wants to be right about environmental calamity?But I think it's healthy to face hard truths(2/2)
fauxnews - April 18, 2015, 11:27 pm
(reply to #75324) Of course, Calron. I'm not suggesting suddenly science should stop being skeptical about this or anything. I'm just pointing out that, for now and for awhile now, the findings are standing up to the scrutiny very well.(1/2)
calron - April 18, 2015, 11:25 pm
Includes many skeptics. I agree that mankind has caused some of the warming and still am skeptical of whether we cause most of it. Your standard doesn't account for that.
calron - April 18, 2015, 11:23 pm
Well science doesn't equal numbers. The actual descent on that is greater that what you represent AND there is also the debate on the effects of AGW and how serious they will be fracturing the number even further. And of course, your standard here...
fauxnews - April 18, 2015, 11:13 pm
whatever the EXACT number is, the dissent represents a minority SO small that it doesn't really matter IN a qualitative sense. We can infer at this point that science SAYS that MMCC is unequivocal.That doesn't mean anyone is required to AGREE with it(2/2)
fauxnews - April 18, 2015, 11:10 pm
Calron....given that the exhaustive debate over MMCC has concluded, it is reasonable to infer that the clear majority of scientists have found MMCC to be unequivocal. Whether it is 95.2% or 99.9% doesn't change the fact that (1/2)
fauxnews - April 18, 2015, 11:06 pm
Sorry if I got carried away Moo+. Just caught this. I'll tone it down if you feel as if I'm going too far with my rant.lol Was trying to indict D.ick Cheney logic. But maybe I was making it TOO personal. I hear what you're saying. Roger that. Cheers :-)
calron - April 18, 2015, 11:05 pm
I forgot to add, The 97% from Zimmerman comes from 75 out of 77 specialists with more than 50% of their peer reviewed papers on AGM. It is a very small number from a small sliver of the scientific community.
fauxnews - April 18, 2015, 11:04 pm
...because doing whatever you can, at all costs to defend that point of view, is not only right but is also the most honest and officiously heroic thing a person could do. My 2 cents, mate. Cheers
fauxnews - April 18, 2015, 11:02 pm
...but because you believe you are required to lie to cover up the what you think is the brutal tooth-and-claw realpolitik dirty deeds most of us dont want to admit our civilization is based on.You think that is what makes you strong in the American sense
Mooooooooooooooooooo - April 18, 2015, 11:02 pm

You can't tell people what they are implying. That only amounts to what you are inferring. Putting words in the mouths of others only diminishes your own credibility.
fauxnews - April 18, 2015, 11:00 pm
...(and, of course, stitching “facts” together at will to support all these views) you are not really pretending that your telling the truth. The implication, though, is that you're lying not because you're a scoundrel who’s out for your himself...
fauxnews - April 18, 2015, 10:57 pm
... By which I mean, when you refuse to admit that you were ever wrong about anything, never giving an inch on the scientific consensus about MMCC or even on a simple question about your gender (which you once were caught being deceptive about)...


Don't listen to that... -




SCIENCE! -




HAPPY EASTER! -




rules for radicals, rule number 8 -




Total Deaths: 60 -




robo rubio -


TAGS: rubio robo reply hillary clinton hack attack
Rating: 0/5

More politifakes by calron

calron - February 13, 2016, 11:54 pm
I think see intentionally copied him.
truthteller - February 13, 2016, 12:01 pm
thank you. even broken clock is right twice a day tea bagger,ha. I couldn't find it the first couple of times when I searched. and this is why I'm voting for Kasich. Im sure Hillary was trying to be funny and I don't want something trying to be President.
calron - February 13, 2016, 4:21 am
https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton/status/697852256557928448?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw
truthteller - February 12, 2016, 11:48 am
accept of course Hillary never posted this when you double-check her twitter account on Feb.11th when this post allegedly was made https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton If a joke,not sure what it is.Rubio is Hillary?Ph**oshop fail but tea party bs success


PREV PAGE